Thursday, November 30, 2006

Logic: What is it

Well, I am also confused about what I wish to convey/ ask but will try to put the following thoughts in the best possible way/ words as well as possible.
I am here not to ask about the dictionary meaning of this word but let's say, the philosophical meaning behind the use of this word. When someone says- what is the logic behind 'this'?? - what does he mean by it. If I give him a answer with some 'vague resoning' which is logic as per me, then whats the problem that majority, as per standard norms, won't accept my 'this'. Can't Logic be said, just as, 'Belief of the majority, which according to the present understanding of the human is almost correct'. Instead of calling a person illogical and insane(??) isn't it better to call him someone with a 'point of view which cannot be accepted in the present scenario'.
I, myself, generally prefer to define Logic as:
Belief of the so-called intellectual

This definition of mine comes from the fact that whenever I have discussions with a so-called intellectual person on the particular topic of 'existence of God/ Supreme Being etc.', 'Possible Existence of advanced Vedic Science', 'Correctness of Astrology' etc., final point where the things ultimately end is - what is the logic behind 'this'?? (Well, to prove astrology I am generally able to give some decent 'logical' explainations but still people won't accept as it is something vague and 'intellectuals can't believe such things..) Hence, lets talk about the case of the existence of Mr. God.
Yes, definitely I havn't seen him, I cannot represent him in some mathematical formula (as of now) but I have, lets say, experienced him because of my 'Belief' (may be you can call it just as Blind faith or say my Brain making me to 'believe' that I'm experiencing him). So, I say according to my logic, which is based on my experience and definitely, Belief, God exists. But for someone like Mr. so-called Intellectual, who neither has the Belief in Mr. God ( & hence wont have experienced him) nor is trying to see someone else's point of view, isn't it just that he is imposing his Belief using the shoulders of widely accepted definition of the Word LOGIC??

Dhoom 2: Bigger and Worse FART

Well, generally I have better things to do than watching a 'tatt' movie like Dhoom2 & also writing a comment/ review on it but I just cant accept how such a big piece of crap & shit be declared as a hit. How can even the reviewers give it more than 1 or 2 Stars ??? How the hell can I spend Rs. 120/- on it. I generally do not watch movies with big stars, Diros and banner.. (Mr. AB, SRK, KJo, etc etc.) as i believe most of the time these cant cater to my taste but this time, just because of the comparatively decent reviews & some faaltu time in hand, I went to see some Action & Sex. But, unfortunately, this movie was lacking even Action & later I realized that I gave 120 bucks to watch only some Indian, oh sorry, its not Indian just some Bollywood 'vulgarity'.
I still can't figure out why this movie was made: may be to show bikini clad gals, a smooch between Mrs. to-be-bachhan (:P) & Mr. Krishh, ad of Coke or what!!! Please tell me....

Lets see what this movie had:
  • Mrs. to-be-bachhan in mini/ ultra minis and Please... her use of like in every sentence was NOT cool.
  • Almost naked/ half naked gals dancing to some very BAD tracks
  • Some action which I definitely cant appreciate ( Probably, i have seen a lot of 'angrezi' (Hollywood) flicks in last 3-4 years
  • Stylish Coke Ads (pun definitely intended)
  • A smooch
  • Bipasha Basu as DCP though she got a fracture and had to be replaced by her twin who knew only 'yeda' in Hindi.
  • Mr. Neel (adi chopra) with Decent(-) comedy, which I believe was the only thing in this movie to watch.
  • Mr. A cant forget he was not Krrish.
  • British Queen who is a distant relative of Mr. A :)
This movie cannot be watched with Family members ( atleast I cant with my parents).
It was a waste of time (though I was anyways wasting time when I went for this movie). And most importantly, if such a movie is called as HIT, God save the Bollywood.
Gadhvi described the movie, to be released later this year, as “bigger, better” and “faster and more furious” than the original Dhoom.
I suggest hime to go & watch 2 fast, 2 furious to know what is meaning of fast & furious.
Dhoom high on sexy elements: Ash
Ma'am, does it have anything other than that??
I cant even compare this movie with Pyar ke Side Effects.. leave aside 'Khosla Ka Ghosla'

Thursday, November 23, 2006

9/11: Was it exactly as you saw it

Well, a lot has been talked about it.. conspiracy theorists, movies etc. And me adding a few lines won't affect a single thing. Still, wanted to compare a few things.. so have a look at these images & links. May be you can make something out of it...

How Stuff Works: Building Implosions


Milan Plane Crash
WTC
Falling STRAIGHT under Gravity ??????????

I'm not talking about prophecies etc.. just SIMPLE enginnering

But, anyways, there are always counter views.. & these seems good.. still not so convincing Yet..

New simulation shows 9/11 plane crash with scientific detail
9/11 Attack Simulations Using LS-Dyna

God knows what really happened.. but for me there was something fishy out there

Monday, November 20, 2006

Life *uks ( * = f,s etc.) :(

I m bored & depressed and will write anything, I can, to prove life *uks....... my biggest mistake being born as a "General Class Hindu Indain Male".. lets see why???
.) So called lower castes like SC/STs/OBCs have a great idiot like Arjun Singh & similar minded a$$holes thinking for them.
.) So called Minorities have great parties & people working for their betterment.. Communists, Congress, Mr. Mulayam & hell lot of other a$$holes
.) Women have a *ucking lady called Renuka Chowdhry for them.. how d hell such people are sent to the 'Supreme Law-Making Body' of the nation. I dont think this b!tch even has a family and therefore, all ready to break the basic fragments of the great indian society - FAMILY. *uck the MAN and make money - seems to be her advice to the fairer sex. According to this wh*re 98% is a small percent -

Karan Thapar: The Centre for Social Research with regard to the anti-dowry law did a study after the Supreme Court judgment came out in August of 2005 and it concluded that of every 100 cases brought under the anti-dowry law, 98 per cent were false. Only two were correct. It’s not a minute percentage; the level of abuse that this could incur is phenomenally high.

Renuka Chowdhury:It’s okay.

Now I can't even think of havin an affair in this holy land, because, lets say for some reason things do not go well, I can be SIMPLY *ucked, 5-10-15 yrs after.

But what else can I do except for writing this piece of $h!t & barking here; I would be working at the time of voting & these idiots will keep ruining this place.

God save this 'bharatvarsha'